For decades, marginalized communities across the U.S. have fought to protect themselves from environmental hazards often dumped in their backyards—whether it be landfills, toxic waste facilities, or refineries. At the centre of this fight lies a powerful legal tool: Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination by any program receiving federal funding. Under this law, regulatory decisions can be challenged not based on intent but on their disproportionate effects on communities of colour.

Yet, despite the promise of Title VI, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has long failed to enforce these protections. This negligence has fueled new efforts by residents, legal advocates, and community groups to push back—culminating in lawsuits, pushback from conservative states, and a renewed call for justice.

The Rise and Stumble of Title VI in Environmental Justice

The story of Title VI’s involvement in environmental justice began in the 1990s when legal advocates realized its potential to tackle discriminatory environmental decisions. Unlike other legal avenues, Title VI allowed for cases where the discriminatory impact on communities, rather than intent, was at the forefront. This became the “holy grail” for marginalized communities dealing with the pollution crisis, from “Cancer Alley” in Louisiana to urban neighbourhoods across the country.

However, despite the law’s clear wording, the EPA allowed thousands of complaints to pile up for years without action. Between 1996 and 2015, more than 95% of Title VI complaints were left unresolved. Faced with this inertia, community groups took legal action against the EPA in 2015, ultimately winning a ruling in 2020 that forced the agency to take its civil rights obligations seriously. Since then, the EPA has opened several high-profile probes, notably in Louisiana and Chicago, signalling a renewed focus on environmental justice.

Also Read: How Climate Migration Actually looks like?

Pushback from the Conservative States

Despite this progress, the renewed enforcement of Title VI has sparked fierce resistance from conservative states. Louisiana led the charge in the spring of 2023, with then-attorney general Jeff Landry suing the EPA over its efforts to investigate environmental racism in “Cancer Alley.” Landry’s lawsuit argued that the federal government was overstepping its authority, and a federal judge recently ruled in Louisiana’s favour, barring the EPA from enforcing Title VI regulations in the state.

This ruling emboldened other conservative leaders. In 2024, a coalition of 23 Republican attorneys general sent a letter to the EPA demanding the suspension of Title VI enforcement nationwide. They argued that the agency’s actions amounted to “racial engineering” and exceeded its mandate. In response, Democratic attorneys general from 16 states urged the EPA to stand firm, highlighting the disproportionate health impacts caused by industrial pollution in communities of colour, which stem from a legacy of racist zoning laws and redlining.

Also Read: Ecological and Gendered Asymmetries in Climate-Induced Displacement

The Way Forward: Balancing Environmental and Civil Rights Protections

Despite political pushback, advocates remain hopeful that the EPA can continue using Title VI to achieve real, lasting environmental justice. Communities across the U.S. have already seen success with Title VI.

• In Chicago, a scrap metal shredder was denied an operating permit in a Black and Latino neighbourhood after residents filed a Title VI complaint.
• In Memphis, a crude oil pipeline project was abandoned after a Title VI lawsuit was filed.

Yet, the battle is far from over. In places like Texas, local governments have fought back against EPA oversight, delaying investigations and resisting efforts to reduce pollution. Legal advocates warn that unless Title VI is enforced consistently and robustly, vulnerable communities will continue to suffer.

At its core, the fight over Title VI enforcement is about more than pollution—it’s about civil rights. As environmental law professor Sheila Foster noted, “Communities are not protected under environmental laws and by environmental agencies because of the narrow way in which harm is measured.” Title VI, she argues, can fill this gap by accounting for the cumulative impact of multiple pollution sources, offering a more holistic approach to protecting marginalized communities.

For many, the hope is that the EPA will resist political pressure and remain steadfast in its mission to deliver justice to those who have been disproportionately harmed for far too long.

Also Read: Real-World Impacts of Climate Change on Marginalized Communities