On Sunday i.e. 22^nd September 2024, a biodiversity initiative failed in a referendum held in Switzerland. This referendum was launched by nature and environmental protection groups. Majority of voters i.e. more than 60%, rejected the idea, which aimed to increase green spaces untouched by human development. Due to urbanization and increased agricultural activities in Switzerland, its plant and animal life is under great threat.

Despite environmentalists’ efforts, voters rejected the increased cost of biodiversity protections quoting it is too expensive.

Swiss rejected proposals on biodiversity and pension reform

Referendums take place four times a year in Switzerland, far more often than in any other European country.

What is the Biodiversity Initiative?

The initiative by environmentalist called for public funding to encourage farmers to set aside lands and waterways to help wild landscapes develop. It also would have prohibited the construction of new railway lines and roadways through protected dry meadows. Proponents pointed to threats to Switzerland’s bees, frogs, birds, and other wildlife, as well as dwindling natural resources.

Also Read: Green Tomorrow: Innovative Climate Change Solutions

What is the Occupational Pension Reform?

The plan that was adopted in 2023 by parliament of Swiss after a long debate, would have required employers and workers to raise their contributions to compulsory occupational funds, an idea widely opposed by trade unions. The idea of compulsory occupational funds is that it will enable the insured person to continue with lifestyle they are used to after retirement. Due to this, a pension income of around 60 per cent of the final salary should be achieved. The Government, wanted to increase the contribution by the employee and workers to make the fund sustainable, which is a very important aspect for an ageing population of Switzerland.

Why Swiss rejected proposals on biodiversity and pension reform?

The federal government and many rural voters opposed the plan for biodiversity initiative, arguing it was too expensive. The total spending on biodiversity protection every year is already €630 million. More about the biodiversity initiative can be read here.

Another proposal on pension reforms was also rejected during the 22^nd of September 2024’s referendums. Together Trade Unions and left-wing parties argued that the extra pay cut for the majority of population would be a negative aspect for part time workers and working women. And those who are not able to sustain extra pay cuts would have to face pension cuts which would mean that whatever they have contributed would go in vain. More about the referendum can be read here.

Also Read: 911 Calls in Montana Reveal Heat Waves Impact on Rural Seniors