A British biologist tests Ganga water, which featured in a viral social media video, and discovers faecal bacteria and human waste, which has greatly stirred discussion about the state of India’s legendary river and its water quality. Jeremy Wade, a British biologist, compares a sample of bottled mineral water with a sample of the Ganga, and the mineral water shows the expected colour change, but the river water is light brown, suggesting faecal coliform bacteria and indicating large amounts of human waste.
Source: Instagram @rivermonsters_official
Video Demonstration and Interpretation
In the demonstration, Wade stated that his colour change test was meant to indicate how polluted the respective river was: “If it is pink, then the river is clean, and if it is another colour, it means trouble.” He tested mineral water as a control, then used a sample of Ganga water that turned yellowish-brown, which he attributed to the presence of faecal coliform bacteria, and told the audience that the water sample “is full of human excrement.” This starkly worded description has been very effective at eliciting strong reactions.
The scientist additionally points out the difficulty in creating environmental awareness about a river that is important to several religions and cultures. Making the public aware of the potential effects of pollution on a river has offended some of the individuals who believe in and worship the river as a deity.
Also Read: Climate Change Drives The Next Phase Of India-EU Partnership
Public Reaction and Health Implications
The video sparked strong reactions online, with many viewers worried about the river’s condition and some questioning why pollution persists in a river considered sacred, calling for greater responsibility and action to improve water quality. Others emphasized the need to balance scientific worries with respect for cultural practices, as the river is central to many people’s religious life.
Environmental scientists say high levels of faecal coliform bacteria can indicate sewage contamination, raising the risk of waterborne diseases such as gastrointestinal infections and other illnesses if people touch or drink untreated water. Past tests during mass bathing events have also shown bacteria levels above safe limits.
Also Read: Climate Patterns And Extreme Winters: What Links Kamchatka, India, And The United States
Broader Context and Water Quality Work
This discovery comes at a time when several cleaning and rejuvenation works of the River Ganga are in progress, primarily implemented through central government-driven programs such as the Namami Gange Mission, which aims to reduce pollution and upgrade sewage handling infrastructure along the river course.
While the debate continues in forums, both online and offline, the viral video has brought to light the dichotomy between long-standing environmental problems and the need for transparent, science-based discussions about water safety and the river’s health. A British biologist tests Ganga water and finds clear evidence of persistent pollution in one of the world’s most culturally significant rivers.
What (Indicator) |
Verified Data Point |
Where / Coverage |
Time period |
|---|---|---|---|
Sewage generated vs treatment capacity (main stem states) |
10,160 MLD sewage generated vs 7,820 MLD STP capacity (gap being addressed via projects) |
5 Ganga main-stem states |
Stated in Dec 2025 |
STP capacity under implementation |
1,996 MLD sewage treatment projects at various stages to bridge the gap |
5 Ganga main-stem states |
Stated in Dec 2025 |
CPCB monitoring footprint |
112 monitoring locations across five Ganga main-stem states (UK 19, UP 41, Bihar 33, Jharkhand 4, WB 15) |
Main-stem Ganga |
Stated in Dec 2025 |
BOD non-conformance (bathing criteria exceptions) |
River stretch not conforming for BOD at specific UP stretches (e.g., Farrukhabad–Purana Rajapur (Kanpur); Dalmau (Raibareilly); etc.) |
Uttar Pradesh stretches listed |
Median values Jan–Aug 2025 |
Bathing criteria reference (key thresholds) |
CPCB bathing criteria includes BOD ≤ 3 mg/L and Faecal Coliform ≤ 2,500 MPN/100 ml (among key indicators) |
Reference standard used in CPCB/NGT reporting |
Referenced in CPCB status reporting |
Faecal coliform “hotspot” example |
92,000 MPN/100 ml faecal coliform reported in Ganga samples (Bihar context highlighted) |
Bihar (as cited in reporting) |
Reported for 2023 sampling context |
Scale of microbial contamination (snapshot) |
71% of monitored stations reported “alarming” faecal coliform levels (based on CPCB-tested stations that month) |
Ganga monitoring stations (subset tested) |
January 2023 |
Event-linked improvement example |
Varanasi faecal coliform reported as 17,000 → 2,300 MPN/100 ml (before vs after event monitoring) |
Varanasi |
Maha Kumbh 2025 monitoring context |
Also Read: Trump Administration Initiates Process For New Offshore Oil Leases Off California Coast

0 Comments