The financial sector is increasingly under fire for its significant role in contributing to deforestation at a time when the world is putting increased emphasis on climate change and biodiversity loss. In its most recent Forest 500–Finance report, Global Canopy stated that in 2024, 150 top global financial institutions (representing over US$8.9 trillion in financing) financed companies that contribute to the deforestation economy. Conveniently, considering that deforestation drives about 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions, this makes finance a significant enabler of both the loss of nature and its preservation. Alarmingly, 60% of global investors have no deforestation policies, leaving both ecosystems and economies vulnerable.
The World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report 2025 lists nature loss among the top four global threats over the next decade. Yet, despite new measures like the EU Deforestation Regulation, financial flows remain largely misaligned with sustainability goals.
What Does the Latest Forest 500 Report Reveal About Financial Exposure to Deforestation?
The 2025 Forest 500 Finance report analyzed 150 financial institutions with the highest exposure to deforestation risks. These institutions financed 500 companies linked to nine forest-risk commodities, such as palm oil, soy, beef, and timber.
- US$8.9 trillion was directed toward companies in the deforestation economy in 2024.
- US$864 billion of this went to entities with no commitment to halt deforestation.
- Three institutions—Vanguard, BlackRock, and JPMorgan Chase—accounted for over US$1.6 trillion, giving them outsized influence.
- Institutions in China, the United States, and France were among the most prominent financiers of corporate laggards.
This level of exposure highlights not only ecological harm but also long-term financial risks. Regulators like the Bank of England have already warned that unchecked nature loss could destabilize economies and economic systems.
Also Read: Colombia’s Deforestation Soared 43% Amid Fires And Land-Grabbing Surge
Why Do 60% of Global Investors Have No Deforestation Policies?
The report found that 60% of global investors have no deforestation policies, with 90 out of 150 assessed institutions failing to adopt them. Despite years of increasing evidence, the percentage has hardly changed.
Some of the key reasons are:
- Limited recognition of deforestation as a material business risk.
- The percentage of institutions that acknowledged deforestation as a business risk in 2024 remained at 37%, just as it was in 2023.
- Dependence on short-term financial returns based on commodities like soy, beef, and palm oil.
- There is hesitation to change investment strategies due to little regulatory pressure to do so.
Some of the major players illustrate this inertia:
- Vanguard and BlackRock do not have comprehensive limits.
- JPMorgan Chase limits their restrictions to palm oil only and has not placed restrictions on other commodities.
Without robust policies, investors risk not only accelerating forest destruction but also undermining global climate and biodiversity goals.
Also Read: Deforestation Drops By 55% In Afro-Descendant Territories, Study Finds
How Effective Are Existing Deforestation Policies in the Finance Sector?
Among the 60 institutions that do have policies, progress is patchy:
- 27 institutions (45%) screen and monitor portfolios for compliance.
- 32 (53%) engage with non-compliant companies.
- Only 17 (28%) impose time-bound divestment threats.
- Just three institutions, BBVA, Deutsche Bank, and Lloyds, apply screening across all high-risk commodities.
Many commitments remain symbolic rather than transformative, which reinforces the larger concern that 60% of global investors have no deforestation policies at all. Without more decisive action, both groups risk enabling ongoing forest destruction and exposing themselves to long-term financial instability.
Finance Sector Deforestation Policies: A Snapshot
| Aspect | Number of Institutions (Out of 150) | Percentage | Key Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Deforestation Policy | 90 | 60% | Vanguard, BlackRock |
| Have a Deforestation Policy | 60 | 40% | JPMorgan Chase (limited to palm oil) |
| Screen and Monitor Portfolios | 27 | 18% | BBVA, Deutsche Bank, Lloyds |
| Engagement Processes for Non-Compliance | 32 | 21% | Barclays and others |
| Threaten Divestment | 17 | 11% | Bank Negara Indonesia, Schroders |
Share of Institutions with Deforestation Policies
Also Read: 88% Of Companies See Sustainability As A Long-Term Value Driver: Morgan Stanley Report
What Are the Environmental and Economic Implications of This Inaction?
The absence of strong financial safeguards against deforestation has far-reaching consequences:
- Climate Change: Forest destruction releases stored carbon, accelerating global warming.
- Biodiversity Loss: Deforestation erodes ecosystems, threatening species survival.
- Economic Instability: Future regulations may turn today’s forest-risk assets into stranded assets, causing financial losses.
- Reputational Risk: Institutions failing to act face growing public and consumer scrutiny.
The report warns that without proactive stewardship, financing deforestation will undermine transition finance initiatives and derail global net-zero pathways.
Also Read: Top Global Companies Contribute $28 Trillion in Climate Damage, Study Finds
What Steps Are Recommended to Address This Issue?
The Forest 500 report calls deforestation a “solvable crisis” and urges systemic reforms in finance. Some suggestions are:
- Comprehensive Policies: Cover all forest-risk commodities and address human rights concerns.
- Transparent Screening and Monitoring: To ensure accountability, publicly report progress.
- Active Engagement: Collaborate with companies to ensure alignment with deforestation-free standards.
- Time-Bound Divestment: Adopt strict timelines for cutting ties with non-compliant firms.
- Stronger Stewardship: Use financial leverage to drive systemic change toward a nature-positive economy.
Implementing these steps is essential, particularly since 60% of global investors have no deforestation policies and remain exposed to stranded assets, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties.
Also Read: Over 60% Of Nifty50 Companies Commit To Climate Goals, Including Net Zero Targets: IiAS Report
FAQ Section
Q: What is the Forest 500 report?
A: It is an annual assessment by Global Canopy evaluating companies and financial institutions most exposed to deforestation risks.
Q: How much financing did the top 150 institutions provide to the deforestation economy in 2024?
A: US$8.9 trillion, including US$864 billion for companies without deforestation commitments.
Q: Which institutions have the highest exposure?
A: Vanguard, BlackRock, and JPMorgan Chase, collectively over US$1.6 trillion.
Q: What percentage of institutions recognize deforestation as a business risk?
A: About 37%, with no improvement from 2023 to 2024.
Q: When was the latest finance-focused Forest 500 report published?
A: August 14, 2025, under the title Deforestation is a Bad Investment.
Also Read: How Companies Can Limit Deforestation?

0 Comments